[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ELPA policy
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: ELPA policy |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 16:58:50 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> MELPA is also *easier* to contribute to. Aside from copyright issues, it
> involves writing something that looks like lisp, testing on your local
> fork, then a PR.
What is a PR?
> With GNU ELPA, it involves some fairly obscure git cleverness. GNU ELPA
> could be made easier by allowing recipes, and by accepting PRs. This
> avoids the necessity to have commit access to GNU ELPA to contribute.
Maybe we should do this (but I don't know what a PR is).
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: ELPA policy, (continued)
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/12
- Re: ELPA policy, Filipp Gunbin, 2015/11/13
- Re: ELPA policy, Richard Stallman, 2015/11/11
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: ELPA policy, Phillip Lord, 2015/11/12
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/12
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/12
- Re: ELPA policy,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: ELPA policy, JJ Asghar, 2015/11/13
- RE: ELPA policy, Drew Adams, 2015/11/11
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- RE: ELPA policy, Drew Adams, 2015/11/11
- Re: ELPA policy, Richard Stallman, 2015/11/11
- RE: ELPA policy, Drew Adams, 2015/11/11
- Re: ELPA policy, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/11
- Re: ELPA policy, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/11
- Re: ELPA policy, Richard Stallman, 2015/11/12
- Re: ELPA policy, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/12