[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: A better UI than perform-replace
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: A better UI than perform-replace |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:40:03 -0800 (PST) |
> Good idea. And as addressing your first concern above suggests,
> the most suitable buffer would be *Occur* itself. It already
> displays all matches, and what is missing is just what you propose:
> new keybindings and Dired-like indication on the left edge.
>
> In fact, we already have 'occur-edit-mode' acting on *Occur* buffer.
> So what we could do is to add a similar mode 'occur-replace-mode'
> that will perform 'automatic-all' on 'C-c C-c'.
+1.
And Juri will have a patch for it in about...45 minutes. ;-)
- Rename refactoring, or something like that, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/16
- A better UI than perform-replace (was: Rename refactoring, or something like that), Oleh Krehel, 2015/11/16
- Re: A better UI than perform-replace, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/16
- RE: A better UI than perform-replace (was: Rename refactoring, or something like that), Drew Adams, 2015/11/16
- Re: A better UI than perform-replace (was: Rename refactoring, or something like that), Richard Stallman, 2015/11/17
- Re: A better UI than perform-replace, Juri Linkov, 2015/11/17
- RE: A better UI than perform-replace,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: A better UI than perform-replace, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/18
- Re: A better UI than perform-replace, Juri Linkov, 2015/11/18
- Re: A better UI than perform-replace, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/18
- Re: A better UI than perform-replace, Juri Linkov, 2015/11/19
- Re: A better UI than perform-replace, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/21
- Re: A better UI than perform-replace, John Yates, 2015/11/19
- Re: A better UI than perform-replace, John Wiegley, 2015/11/19
- Re: A better UI than perform-replace, John Yates, 2015/11/19
- Re: A better UI than perform-replace, John Wiegley, 2015/11/19
- Re: A better UI than perform-replace, Adrian . B . Robert, 2015/11/20