Re: Making --with-wide-int the default

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Achim Gratz <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:32:10 +0100
> 
> The trigger for making that switch on all my old 32bit machines was
> that you can't represent an awful lot of dates on any modern system
> otherwise.  So the decision should really be based on what size
> time_t is, IMHO.

Maybe I misunderstand you, but the --with-wide-int option doesn't (and
cannot) change anything wrt the time_t type.  If it was a 32-bit type
without wide ints, it will still be a 32-bit type with them.

Or did you mean something else?