Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'.

[Karl Fogel]

Artur Malabarba <address@hidden> writes:
>2015-11-17 0:42 GMT+00:00 Karl Fogel <address@hidden>:
>> Artur, it sounds to me like there is not yet consensus on what C-o
>> should do at column >0.  There have been plausible arguments both
>> ways.
>
>I just want to say I haven't forgotten about this thread. I'm 1 week
>away from the most important day of the last 3 years for me, so I'm
>going to be absent for 7 more days. After that, this thread is one of
>the first things on my list.
>
>And don't worry about the timing of the release branch. I'm
>considering this a bugfix, so I'll keep my change feature-freeze-safe
>(there's a decent chance I'll just revert).

Thanks for letting us know, Artur.

If you're swamped, I'm happy to do the reversion (pretty easy for me, since 
I've been following the changes & the thread in detail), but I won't unless you 
say so.

(Can only guess that "most important day" is Ph.D. defense?  Break a leg!)

Best regards,
-Karl