Re: Dynamic loading progress

[Paul Eggert]

On 11/19/2015 08:27 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> The code in module.c runs in Emacs, so I think it's friendly enough
> (apart of the xmalloc issue).  Or did I misunderstand what you meant?

It's the xmalloc issue. That is, if a module contains random C code 
inside a library outside of your control that invokes malloc, I suppose 
it's a lost cause, we can't memory-profile that. But if as part of a 
module you write a wrapper for Emacs, the wrapper code should use 
xmalloc rather than malloc, so that at least we can account for its 
memory and fail in a standard way if it's not available. That sort of thing.