[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dynamic loading progress
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Dynamic loading progress |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Nov 2015 20:50:28 +0200 |
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:44:01 -0800
>
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > I thought your design decision was already to use int64 for any
> > integer argument, no?
>
> I later changed that to use intmax_t for any integers that might be converted
> to
> or from Emacs fixnums.
Yes, okay. But intmax_t is a 64-bit type on most modern platforms,
right?
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, (continued)
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/20
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/20
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/20
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Paul Eggert, 2015/11/20
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/20
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Philipp Stephani, 2015/11/20
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Paul Eggert, 2015/11/20
- Re: Dynamic loading progress,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Paul Eggert, 2015/11/20
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Philipp Stephani, 2015/11/20
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Paul Eggert, 2015/11/20
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Philipp Stephani, 2015/11/20
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Paul Eggert, 2015/11/20
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Philipp Stephani, 2015/11/20
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Paul Eggert, 2015/11/20
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Philipp Stephani, 2015/11/21
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Ted Zlatanov, 2015/11/23
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Philipp Stephani, 2015/11/20