Re: Dynamic modules: should should-error work?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Philipp Stephani <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 19:27:32 +0000
> Cc: address@hidden
> 
>     + (let ((descr (should-error (mod-test-sum 1 2 3))))
>     + (should (eq (car descr) 'wrong-number-of-arguments))
>     
> 
> I think testing using :type would also accept subtypes of the given type, 
> which
> I think would be preferrable (I'd expect that generally subtypes of the
> documented signals are allowed to be thrown).

I'm not sure I understand what you are saying.  Can you give an
example?

>     + (should (stringp (nth 1 descr)))
>     + (should (eq 0
>     + (string-match "#<module function at \\(0x\\)?[0-9a-fA-F]+>"
>     + (nth 1 descr))))
>     + (should (= (nth 2 descr) 3))))
> 
> Maybe replace the regex with "\\`#<module function.*>\\'" to make it work if
> dladdr is available.

That's what I did in the final commit a few minutes ago.

Thanks.