[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More over-engineering
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: More over-engineering |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Nov 2015 13:53:22 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> should protect itself from signals and 'throw' in the called
>> Emacs functions, by placing the macros MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS
>> and/or MODULE_HANDLE_THROW right after the above 2 tests.
>> + FIXME: Why is it always needed? What happens if we don't?
>> + Why is only one of the two needed rather than always both?
> I indeed think we should have only one macro that does the job of all
> three of them. It's on my todo to make that change, if no one beats
> me to it.
How 'bout the other question: what happens if we don't use that macro?
Stefan
- More over-engineering, Stefan Monnier, 2015/11/27
- Re: More over-engineering, Aurélien Aptel, 2015/11/27
- Re: More over-engineering, David Kastrup, 2015/11/27
- Re: More over-engineering, Stefan Monnier, 2015/11/27
- Re: More over-engineering, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/27
- Re: More over-engineering,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: More over-engineering, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/27
- Re: More over-engineering, Stefan Monnier, 2015/11/27
- Re: More over-engineering, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/28
- Re: More over-engineering, Stefan Monnier, 2015/11/28
- Re: More over-engineering, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/28
- Re: More over-engineering, Paul Eggert, 2015/11/28
- Re: More over-engineering, Stefan Monnier, 2015/11/30
- Re: More over-engineering, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/30
- Re: More over-engineering, Stefan Monnier, 2015/11/30
- Re: More over-engineering, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/30