Re: If records are not sequences, why does aref work on records?

[Paul Eggert]

Noam Postavsky wrote:
> having copy-record would still be a good idea, as it helps
> show the intent better.

If we go that route, for consistency shouldn't Emacs also have aref-record and 
aref-byte-code-function as aliases for 'aref'?

A couple more glitches in current master, while we're at it: (aref 1 2) signals 
(wrong-type-argument arrayp 1) even though aref's first argument need not be an 
array. Similarly, (copy-sequence 1) signals (wrong-type-argument sequencep 1) 
even though copy-sequence's first argument need not be a sequence.