[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Loading a package applies automatically to future sessions?
From: |
Clément Pit-Claudel |
Subject: |
Re: Loading a package applies automatically to future sessions? |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jan 2018 15:18:16 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 |
On 2018-01-29 14:08, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> I don't think I can easily bring down the speed of package-initialize
> much below 0.1s for my 200 packages on my Thinkpad T61.
FWIW, activating about 100 packages in my config takes about .4s:
- package-initialize 232 89%
+ package-activate 136 52%
+ package-read-all-archive-contents 64 24%
+ package-load-all-descriptors 24 9%
+ package--build-compatibility-table 8 3%
More precisely:
- package-initialize 232 89%
- package-activate 136 52%
- package-activate-1 136 52%
- package--load-files-for-activation 96 36%
- package--activate-autoloads-and-load-path 68 26%
+ load 68 26%
+ file-truename 28 10%
- package-activate 32 12%
+ package-activate-1 32 12%
- require 8 3%
+ defvar 4 1%
- package-read-all-archive-contents 64 24%
- package-read-archive-contents 64 24%
- package--add-to-archive-contents 44 16%
+ package--append-to-alist 4 1%
package--read-archive-file 20 7%
- package-load-all-descriptors 24 9%
- package-load-descriptor 24 9%
+ package-process-define-package 8 3%
#<compiled 0xd255c5> 4 1%
+ package--build-compatibility-table 8 3%
The reverse tree is also interesting:
+ file-truename 60 23%
+ package--add-to-archive-contents 40 15%
Automatic GC 24 9%
+ package--read-archive-file 20 7%
+ load-with-code-conversion 16 6%
+ eval-buffer 16 6%
+ package-load-descriptor 12 4%
+ package--mapc 8 3%
+ let 4 1%
+ #<compiled 0xd255c5> 4 1%
+ package-desc-from-define 4 1%
+ version-to-list 4 1%
+ package-desc-priority-version 4 1%
It looks likes package--add-to-archive-contents is linear in the number of
packages, and called once per package?
I'm not sure why file-truename is called that much.
Clément.
- Re: Loading a package applies automatically to future sessions?, (continued)
- Re: Loading a package applies automatically to future sessions?, John Wiegley, 2018/01/29
- Re: Loading a package applies automatically to future sessions?, Stefan Monnier, 2018/01/29
- Re: Loading a package applies automatically to future sessions?, John Wiegley, 2018/01/29
- Re: Loading a package applies automatically to future sessions?, Stefan Monnier, 2018/01/29
- Re: Loading a package applies automatically to future sessions?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2018/01/29
- Re: Loading a package applies automatically to future sessions?, T.V Raman, 2018/01/29
- Re: Loading a package applies automatically to future sessions?,
Clément Pit-Claudel <=
- Re: Loading a package applies automatically to future sessions?, Stefan Monnier, 2018/01/30
- Re: Loading a package applies automatically to future sessions?, George Plymale II, 2018/01/30
- Re: Loading a package applies automatically to future sessions?, George Plymale II, 2018/01/30
- Re: Loading a package applies automatically to future sessions?, Stefan Monnier, 2018/01/30
- Re: Loading a package applies automatically to future sessions?, George Plymale II, 2018/01/31
- Re: Loading a package applies automatically to future sessions?, George Plymale II, 2018/01/31
- Re: Loading a package applies automatically to future sessions?, Stefan Monnier, 2018/01/31
- Re: Loading a package applies automatically to future sessions?, George Plymale II, 2018/01/31
- Re: Loading a package applies automatically to future sessions?, George Plymale II, 2018/01/31
- Re: Loading a package applies automatically to future sessions?, T.V Raman, 2018/01/30