Re: rx.el sexp regexp syntax

[Basil L. Contovounesios]

"Basil L. Contovounesios" <address@hidden> writes:

> Robert Pluim <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> João Távora <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Drew Adams <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> Given such functions, I might use RX and the show-me-the-regexp
>>>> function to create a regexp string, which I'd leave in the code,
>>>> and I might use the show-me-the-RX function when I need to change
>>>> such a string (or think about it).
>>>
>>> +1, FWIW. But are there such functions? </delurk>
>>
>> rx->regexp obviously exists, but Iʼm not aware of the reverse.
>
> At first glance, lex-parse-re from lex.el seems to fill the role, though
                                     ^^^^^^
I meant lex-parse-re.el, which is part of the lex package on ELPA.

-- 
Basil