Re: Aliasing EQ to EQL

[Daniel Colascione]

>> For what?  This aliasing has _zero_ real world benefit.
>
> The benefit (cleaner, simpler language) is marginal, indeed.
>
>> I maintain that this is a change we should absolutely not make.
>
> I have no intention to push this change.
> But I think eventually we will make a change along those lines.

Maybe once we have a JIT and can reasonably infer in the right context
that in order to implement EQL-comparison, we need just check object
identity.