Re: Why is .ml associated with lisp-mode in auto-mode-alist?

[Andreas Röhler]

On 24.06.2018 22:55, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Richard Stallman wrote:
>
> > GNU Emacs did support Mocklisp (by translation and emulation) for a
> > few years in the 1980s.  I hope and expect nobody uses it any more.
>
> Yes, it would be helpful if .ml were to default to a mode useful for 
> editing ML code. I think the most commonly-used Elisp code for that is 
> Tuareg Mode, which is GPL'ed; how about if we default to that? See:
>
> https://github.com/ocaml/tuareg

What about https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/sml-mode.html?