[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bignum branch
From: |
Andy Moreton |
Subject: |
Re: bignum branch |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Aug 2018 20:54:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (windows-nt) |
On Fri 03 Aug 2018, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Andy Moreton <address@hidden>
>> Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2018 15:05:56 +0100
>>
>> > Any idea how come these errors don't happen in the 64-bit MinGW64
>> > build? They use the same headers, so what is different that triggers
>> > the errors only in the 32-bit build?
>>
>> They don't happen in the 32bit MinGW (mingw.org) build on master either.
>>
>> I assume that something got fixed on the master branch after the bignum
>> branch was created, and that the bignum branch has not been rebased
>> since then.
If I apply the following from master to the bignum branch then a 32bit
MinGW build succeeds:
024d20f81e ("Fix compilation with mingw.org's MinGW 5.x headers")
bd52f37cae ("Fix last change: only MinGW runtime 5.0.2 and later needs
that.")
> OK, let's wait until bignum is merged, and take it from there.
Yes, that will fix it.
AndyM
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/08/02
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/03
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/08/03
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/03
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/08/03
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/03
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/08/03
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/03
- Re: bignum branch,
Andy Moreton <=
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/04
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/08/04
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/04
- Re: bignum branch, Tom Tromey, 2018/08/03
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/08/03
- Re: bignum branch, Tom Tromey, 2018/08/03
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/08/03
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/04
- Re: bignum branch, Achim Gratz, 2018/08/04
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/04