[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp
|
From: |
Clément Pit-Claudel |
|
Subject: |
Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp |
|
Date: |
Mon, 6 Aug 2018 09:50:00 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 |
On 2018-08-06 04:07, Michael Albinus wrote:
>> Wasn't there are a proposal at one point to do something
>> similar for C-x 4 and C-x 5 so that there didn't have to be
>> -other-window and -other-frame variants of so many
>> commands?
>> I'm not aware of such a proposal (which only means that my memory is
> bad), but it makes sense.
Indeed, that would be very nice (I don't remember such a proposal either,
though)
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, (continued)
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/04
- RE: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Drew Adams, 2018/08/04
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/04
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Richard Stallman, 2018/08/04
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Michael Albinus, 2018/08/05
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Richard Stallman, 2018/08/05
- RE: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Drew Adams, 2018/08/05
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Howard Melman, 2018/08/06
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/08/06
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Michael Albinus, 2018/08/06
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp,
Clément Pit-Claudel <=
- RE: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Drew Adams, 2018/08/06
- RE: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Drew Adams, 2018/08/06
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Howard Melman, 2018/08/06
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Stefan Monnier, 2018/08/06
Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Dmitry Gutov, 2018/08/08