Re: Some vars now limited to fixnum size.

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:

>> I think the bytecode interpreter needs a similar update.

Paul> I don't see any problems with the Bnthcdr implementation in the
Paul> bytecode interpreter, as it simply calls Fnthcdr.

Paul> Perhaps you are thinking of some other bignum problems in the bytecode
Paul> interpreter? I just now took a quick look and found some problems, and
Paul> fixed the ones that I found by installing the attached patch. Did I
Paul> miss any?

Sorry, I thought you were looking at nth, not nthcdr.  I'm not thinking
super clearly lately, one fun effect of my illness.

The Bnth case in the bytecode interpreter only worked on fixnums but I
see you fixed that in your patch -- thanks.  I'd noticed Beqlsign being
wrong yesterday, too, but I see you fixed that as well :)

Tom