Re: Image transformations

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 05:57:21 -0400
> 
> > I think this would be a wasted effort.  There's no need to make all
> > the implementations use the same matrix, unless they all assign the
> > same semantics to the matrix -- which doesn't appear to be the case,
> > at least not as far as this discussion shows.
> 
> There's one case where this would make sense: if we decide to let Elisp
> provide such a matrix.

Why would providing a matrix interface be a good idea?  I think an
interface based on attributes (:crop, :rotation, etc.) is much cleaner
and easier to use.  We can always add more attributes (like :shear) if
we want.

What am I missing?