Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 6cfda69 1/2: Add support for dealing with decoded time structures

[Basil L. Contovounesios]

Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:

> The two functions are not equivalent, as date-days-in-month uses astronomical
> year numbering, whereas calendar-last-day-of-month uses traditional year
> numbering, with no year zero.

Okay, thanks for pointing that out (though calendar-leap-year-p is
equivalent to date-leap-year-p for zero and positive years).

While having a second look at this I noticed timezone-leap-year-p is
identical to date-leap-year-p.  Should the former become an obsolete
alias of the latter?

Thanks,

-- 
Basil