Re: master fe939b3 1/2: Fix reference to `tags-loop-continue' in doc string

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 8/4/19 3:03 PM, Robert Pluim wrote:
> It begs the question why xrefs replaced a 'do the next thing' type
> binding with a 'go back' type binding in the first place.

Because it's more useful. The xref UI presents you with all matches 
right away, and you choose before visiting, so you don't really need the 
"go next" binding 98% of the time.

There's also 'next-error', which navigates between the matches too.

> Iʼm tempted
> to say that xref-pop-marker-stack should use a different binding, and
> M-, should be fileloop-continue, but the xref one has existed for 5
> years now.

Exactly. That ship has sailed. If you are still not convinced, please go 
ahead and look up the older discussions for our reasoning.