[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
historial question: the first commits (is the conversion screwed?)
From: |
Uwe Brauer |
Subject: |
historial question: the first commits (is the conversion screwed?) |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Aug 2019 13:02:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi
I know that Emacs used various VC systems, RCS, CVS, BZR and finally
git.
I got interested in the first commits, so I run
either
git log --reverse
Or since I converted the repo to mercurial
hg up 1
In both cases I see:
ommit ce5584125c44a1a2fbb46e810459c50b227a95e2
Author: Jim Blandy <address@hidden>
Date: Thu Apr 18 00:48:29 1985 +0000
entered into RCS
commit ff9c6df4b0766bef72f6b1f4c8fca65737d9ad6b
Author: Jim Blandy <address@hidden>
Date: Sat Dec 14 16:58:10 1985 +0000
Initial revision
What puzzles me, is that there were so few commits when starting the
project and
Jim Blandy <address@hidden>
redhat in 1985, really?
>From wikipedia:
Founded in 1993, Red Hat has its corporate headquarters
This is not really a serious issue, but I wondered whether the
conversion process worked reliable, at least for the first commits.
Regards
Uwe Brauer
- historial question: the first commits (is the conversion screwed?),
Uwe Brauer <=
Re: historial question: the first commits (is the conversion screwed?), Stefan Monnier, 2019/08/17
Re: historial question: the first commits (is the conversion screwed?), John Wiegley, 2019/08/17