[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts
|
From: |
martin rudalics |
|
Subject: |
Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts |
|
Date: |
Sat, 16 Nov 2019 09:57:52 +0100 |
> Ah, yes. When I said ‘side by side’, I had not meant ‘split
> vertically’, just ‘next to each other’, in this case: in the same
> frame. Sorry for confusion.
And thanks for resolving it.
martin
- Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts, Richard Stallman, 2019/11/10
- Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts, Óscar Fuentes, 2019/11/10
- Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/11
- Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts, martin rudalics, 2019/11/11
- Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/11
- Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts, martin rudalics, 2019/11/12
- Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/16
- Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts,
martin rudalics <=
Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts, Richard Stallman, 2019/11/11
Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts, João Távora, 2019/11/11
Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts, Richard Stallman, 2019/11/11