Re: Merging the underline attribute at EOL

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 21:31:56 +0100
> From: Ergus <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> 
> I had build a wrong branch where I have actually added
> 
> NILP (face->lface[LFACE_EXTEND_INDEX])
> 
> to the condition you mention.
> 
> Actually the question is why there is only: 
> 
> face->box == FACE_NO_BOX
> 
> Maybe we have to remove it and rely only in the extend attribute?

If the extend attribute is set, but the background color is the same
as the default, and there's no box/underline/overline/strikethrough
attributes set, then we can still return early, no?