[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cc-mode Objective C method names
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: cc-mode Objective C method names |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Jan 2020 10:48:54 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
Hello, Alan.
On Wed, Jan 01, 2020 at 11:27:57 +0000, Alan Third wrote:
> One small annoyance I’ve had with developing Emacs is that the
> helpers for filling in the changelog entries don’t work with Objective
> C methods. I’ve tried writing a patch to make it work.
> For reference, an Objective C class looks something like:
> @implementation ClassName
> - (int)doSomething
> {
> /* do that something */
> return 1;
> }
> - (void)doSomethingTo: (SomeClass *)object with: (int)someParam
> {
> return;
> }
> @end
> And I think the methods’ names should be written something like:
> -[ClassName doSomething]
> -[ClassName doSomethingTo:with:]
> The ‘-’ means it’s an instance method and a ‘+’ would mean it was a
> class method.
If either ClassName or doSomethingTo is long, you might be taking up too
much space on, for example, the first line of a commit message. But
you've probably already thought this through. How long are these
extended names in practice?
> It appears to work for me, but I’m not great at Emacs lisp so I
> thought it best to run this by the mailing list in case I’ve made any
> boneheaded errors.
I've got just a few comments to add to Eli's and Stefan's, so ....
> Thanks!
> --
> Alan Third
> >>From 2945f1c6c57eeabdbeb8e7c058070587a9bf4c0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alan Third <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 16:38:47 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] Add ability to find ObjC method names
> * lisp/progmodes/cc-cmds.el (c-defun-name-1): Add Objective-C method
> name ability.
> ---
> lisp/progmodes/cc-cmds.el | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/cc-cmds.el b/lisp/progmodes/cc-cmds.el
> index 0343f9df32..9165398132 100644
> --- a/lisp/progmodes/cc-cmds.el
> +++ b/lisp/progmodes/cc-cmds.el
> @@ -2024,6 +2024,36 @@ c-defun-name-1
> (c-backward-syntactic-ws)
> (point))))
> + ((looking-at "[-+]\\s-*(") ; Objective-C method
I'd be happier here if you could also check we're really in Objc with
(c-major-mode-is 'objc-mode).
> + (let ((class
> + (save-excursion
> + (re-search-backward
> "@\\(implementation\\|class\\|interface\\)")
Here, you might want to give a NOERROR argument to re-search-backward,
so that if implementation etc., isn't found, you can handle the error
gracefully. Something like
(if (re-search-backward "@\\(....\\)" nil t)
(progn
(c-forward-token-2)
.....)
"")
> + (c-forward-token-2)
> + (thing-at-point 'word t)))
> + (type (buffer-substring-no-properties (point) (+ (point) 1)))
> + (name
> + (save-excursion
> + (c-forward-token-2 2 t)
c-forward-token-2 might not be the best function, here. It moves to the
next token, but if there isn't a next token it doesn't move at all.
c-forward-over-token-and-ws might be better. Alternatively, you could
check the result of c-forward-token-2 (say, with zerop) and take special
action if the call has failed. This comment also applies to the later
uses of c-forward-token-2.
> + (let ((name ""))
I feel there ought to be a standard CC Mode function which would do the
following scanning to the {, but I can't find it at the moment.
> + (while (not (looking-at "[{;]"))
Or, (not (memq (char-after) '(?{ ?\;))), which would be minutely faster.
It would also not change the match-data if you cared about that (which
you don't, here).
> + (let ((start (point))
> + (end
> + (progn
> + (c-forward-syntactic-ws)
> + (forward-word)
> + (if (looking-at ":")
> + (+ (point) 1)
> + (point)))))
> + (when (looking-at ":")
> + (c-forward-token-2)
> + (if (looking-at "(")
> + (c-forward-token-2 2 t)
> + (c-forward-token-2 1 t)))
> + (c-forward-syntactic-ws)
> + (setq name (concat name
> (buffer-substring-no-properties start end)))))
Just a small point: isn't name always the empty string before this form?
If so, you could get rid of the concat and just use
buffer-substring-no-properties.
> + name))))
> + (format "%s[%s %s]" type class name)))
As an alternative to format, you could use (concat type "[" class " "
name "]")
, which is more direct, but probably doesn't matter here.
> +
> (t ; Normal function or initializer.
> (when (looking-at c-defun-type-name-decl-key) ; struct, etc.
> (goto-char (match-end 0))
> --
> 2.24.0
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).