Re: Regarding outline headings in emacs-lisp libraries

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas@bernoul.li>
> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 01:26:01 +0200
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> Let's look at it from another perspective: what are the *benefits* of
> making the "major code parts" children of "Code:"?  The only one that
> I can think of is that the name of that section "Code" implies that it
> contains all the code.  I would argue that is a just a tiny benefit as
> well.

But if we agree to your proposal, what would be the purpose of the
"Code:" section?  It no longer contains all of the code, but what does
it contain?