[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Regarding outline headings in emacs-lisp libraries
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Regarding outline headings in emacs-lisp libraries |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:34:00 +0300 |
> From: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas@bernoul.li>
> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:18:03 +0200
>
> Is that what they call a Mexican Standoff?
According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_standoff,
A "Mexican standoff" is a confrontation in which no strategy exists
that allows any party to achieve victory.
I don't think we are in that situation here, because several exit
strategies exist:
. you can disregard my opinion and go with Stefan's
. you can disregard Stefan's opinion and go with mine
. we can still try reaching some compromise (from my POV I'd like to
understand better why renaming "Code" would be a problem; the fact
that it's present in every ELisp file doesn't seem to explain that)
> I think the conversation should be about whether my arguments as to
> *why* we should change the recommended style are sound, but we discuss
> whether "Code:" should be renamed or not.
I don't think there's disagreement about the essence of your proposal,
that's why we are not talking about it.
Re: Regarding outline headings in emacs-lisp libraries, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/07/18
Re: Regarding outline headings in emacs-lisp libraries, Jonas Bernoulli, 2020/07/28
- Re: Regarding outline headings in emacs-lisp libraries,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: Regarding outline headings in emacs-lisp libraries, Richard Stallman, 2020/07/31