Re: master d378615: Cancel timer when world-clock buffer is killed

[Stefan Kangas]

"Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob@tcd.ie> writes:

> Why not keep the (internal) variable and pass it to cancel-timer
> directly instead of searching through timer-list for a particular entry?

Thanks for your attention to detail.

It's a matter of taste, I suppose.  While mucking around with this, I
saw two timers at one point, so I just kept that code as is.  (Although
the particular issue causing two timers should be fixed now.)

Perhaps this should just use `cancel-function-timers' though...

Are there any strong reasons why keeping it in a variable is better?
Maybe we just prefer that style?