[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changes for emacs 28
From: |
Ergus |
Subject: |
Re: Changes for emacs 28 |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Sep 2020 23:45:14 +0200 |
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 09:01:51PM +0000, Stefan Kangas wrote:
Maybe we don't need them fully but at least a part of their
functionalities could be inserted in packages.el?
What do you have in mind?
Actually nothing specific. I just prevented in case it was not ongoing.
OTOH: While I use use-packages I have seen leaf and it seems to have
some interesting things and it is "syntax coherent" in some aspects
while developed by a single user with all the paperwork done.
We must take the best of both. Could we request Naoya Yamashita and John
Wiegley to create together a sort of super use-package-leaf for vanilla?
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, (continued)
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Boruch Baum, 2020/09/08
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, TEC, 2020/09/08
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Yuan Fu, 2020/09/08
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, TEC, 2020/09/08
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, tomas, 2020/09/08
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Ergus, 2020/09/08
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Stefan Kangas, 2020/09/08
- Re: Changes for emacs 28,
Ergus <=
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Stefan Kangas, 2020/09/08
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Ergus, 2020/09/08
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Daniel Martín, 2020/09/08
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Stefan Monnier, 2020/09/09
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, T.V Raman, 2020/09/09
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, TEC, 2020/09/09
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Stefan Monnier, 2020/09/09
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Göktuğ Kayaalp, 2020/09/10
- RE: Changes for emacs 28, Drew Adams, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Yuri Khan, 2020/09/10