Re: master baf331e 3/3: Rename replace-in-string to string-replace

[Stefan Kangas]

Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> > Or (define-obsolete-function-alias 'replace-regexp-in-string
> > #'string-replace-regexp "28.1")
>
> I sympathise with the impulse, because `replace-regexp-in-string' is
> probably the most awkward of the commonly used function names, in my
> extremely, super-duper, incredibly humble opinion (nobody has humbler
> opinions than I do, everybody knows that).
>
> But I don't think the churn would be worth it.

Yeah, that's true.  The suggestion is probably a bit too enthusiastic.