Re: [ELPA] New package: ob-haxe

[Stefan Monnier]

> That makes sense. Where there is shared code or variables it makes
> sense to keep the implementations together.  For the ob-haxe and
> haxe-mode case the implementations are independent of each other.

That's inevitably the case, given that they were developed separately.

> I guess if haxe had a flymake integration it would want to share the
> compiler name variable with ob-haxe, though.

Yup, same thing if there was a REPL with an inferior-haxe-mode.

> Do you think it would be better to merge the packages or just add a
> dependency from haxe-mode to ob-haxe? Does it make a difference?

The difference is the ease with which the two parts can share code.


        Stefan