Re: script-representative-chars for emoji

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 18:55:55 +0200
> 
>     >> I added the following
>     >> 
>     >> (emoji #x1F300 #x1F600 #xFE0F)))
>     >> 
>     >> to script-representative-chars when creating the emoji script, but Iʼm
>     >> now wondering if that #xFE0F was a mistake, as there are fonts that
>     >> can represent emoji that won't have a glyph for VS-16. Iʼve not
>     >> noticed any negative effects so far, but perhaps we should remove it
>     >> in emacs-28?
> 
>     Eli> Didn't we add VS-16 to have sequences that begin with non-Emoji
>     Eli> character and end in VS-16 displayed in Emoji font, the change you 
> did
>     Eli> in font_ranges?  If you remove it, what happens to the likes of 
> U+25AB
>     Eli> followed by U+FE0F ?
> 
> We added it to the emoji script, but that doesnʼt mean it needs to be
> in script-representative-chars. U+25AB U+FE0F is still composed
> correctly and displays with the colourful emoji glyph if I remove it
> from there.

Then I'm okay with removing it.