[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Our use of the "fixed" tag in debbugs
From: |
Basil L. Contovounesios |
Subject: |
Re: Our use of the "fixed" tag in debbugs |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Oct 2021 17:00:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Glenn Morris [2021-10-08 11:41 -0400] wrote:
> "Basil L. Contovounesios" wrote:
>
>> Eli Zaretskii [2021-10-08 14:21 +0300] wrote:
>>
>>> Btw, "close NNN XX.YY" doesn't mark the bug as "done", see
>
> Yes it does.
>
>> But I feel like I've run into a "closed but not done" issue once before,
>> so maybe there's a bug under certain conditions.
>
> I don't know what "closed but not done" really means, but this sounds
> like either:
>
> "forgot to (b)cc the control server" (so not closed at all)
> or
> "closed by forcemerge with an already closed bug" (so closed but no
> new "done" message gets sent out)
I looked earlier but couldn't find the one I was thinking of
unfortunately. My impression is that I closed the bug somehow, received
an email acknowledging that I'd closed it, but on bugs.gnu.org it didn't
say "Done". Perhaps you're right and I misunderstood at the time or am
misremembering.
--
Basil
- Re: Our use of the "fixed" tag in debbugs, (continued)