[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] support for accessing CPU/core count (processor-count)
From: |
Arthur Miller |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] support for accessing CPU/core count (processor-count) |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Oct 2021 11:38:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Omar Polo <op@omarpolo.com> writes:
> Campbell Barton <ideasman42@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hi, this patch adds support for accessing the number of CPU's / cores
>> on a system, matching CPython's multiprocessing.cpu_count() [0].
>>
>> I've only tested this for Linux, this includes code that should work
>> on other platforms, although that would need to be double-checked of
>> course.
>> For reference I checked CPython / Blender & Stack-overflow [1]
>
> I can confirm it works on OpenBSD too, but needs tweaking. Some
> comments inline and attaching an updated patch
>
>> Accessing this information can be useful to automatically detect the
>> number of jobs to run.
>>
>>
>> [0]:
>> https://docs.python.org/3/library/multiprocessing.html#multiprocessing.cpu_count
>> [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/a/3006416/432509
>>
>> commit 7be53f10f3df3c3183cc97d6bbadb78ebb61e8d2
>> Author: Campbell Barton <ideasman42@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sun Oct 10 10:16:47 2021 +1100
>>
>> Support accessing the number of CPU's.
>>
>> Add (processor-count) for accessing the number of cores/CPU's.
>>
>> diff --git a/src/emacs.c b/src/emacs.c
>> index 866e43fda9..26e2f6b1f2 100644
>> --- a/src/emacs.c
>> +++ b/src/emacs.c
>> @@ -3156,6 +3156,38 @@ DEFUN ("daemon-initialized", Fdaemon_initialized,
>> Sdaemon_initialized, 0, 0, 0,
>> return Qt;
>> }
>>
>> +DEFUN ("processor-count", Fprocessor_count, Sprocessor_count, 0, 0, 0,
>> + doc: /* Return the number of CPUs in the system.
>> +
>> +The value will always be above zero, 1 for unsupported systems. */)
>> + (void)
>> +{
>> + int nproc = -1;
>> +#ifdef WINDOWSNT
>> + SYSTEM_INFO info;
>> + GetSystemInfo(&info);
>> + nproc = (int)info.dwNumberOfProcessors;
>> +#elif defined (__APPLE__) || \
>> + defined (__OpenBSD__) || \
>> + defined (__FreeBSD__) || \
>> + defined (__NetBSD__) || \
>> + defined (__DragonFly__)
>> + int mib[2];
>> + size_t len;
>> +
>> + mib[0] = CTL_HW;
>
> the #include <sys/sysctl.h> is missing.
>
>> + mib[1] = HW_NCPU;
>
> at least on OpenBSD this should be HW_NCPUONLINE.
>
> OpenBSD disables hyperthreading by default so HW_NCPU is (almost) always
> misleading. For example, on my machine
>
> % uname -a
> OpenBSD venera 7.0 GENERIC.MP#221 amd64
> % sysctl hw.ncpu
> hw.ncpu=8
> % sysctl hw.ncpuonline
> hw.ncpuonline=4
>
> and this has been the case for a while already (I mean, a couple of
> years if not more.)
>
> I don't have access to other BSDs other than OpenBSD, but judging from
> the manpages online.
>
> - NetBSD has hw.ncpuonline
> - DragonFly and FreeBSD have only hw.ncpu
> - apple I don't know how to check. man.apple.com doesn't seem to
> exists ^^"
>
>> + len = sizeof(nproc);
>> + sysctl(mib, 2, &nproc, &len, nullptr, 0);
> ^^^^^^^
> shouldn't this be NULL?
>
>> +#elif defined (__hpux)
>> + nproc = mpctl(MPC_GETNUMSPUS, NULL, NULL);
>> +#elif defined (_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN)
>> + nproc = (int)sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> + return make_fixnum (MAX(nproc, 1));
>
> emacs.c:3188:23: warning: implicit declaration of function 'MAX' is invalid
> in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>
> I'm attaching an updated patch. Note that I'm not sure if including
> sys/types.h and sys/sysctl.h breaks the build on some OS.
>
> if someone knows how to reduce the number of #ifdefs I'll be glad :)
>
>> +}
>> +
>
> Cheers,
>
> Omar Polo
>
> From 5fe26a73abc60eae7dd2528e3854f2f379bcb4c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Campbell Barton <ideasman42@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 08:21:01 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] add function to access the number of CPU
>
> * emacs.c (Fprocessor_count): add processor-count function to access
> the number of CPU
> ---
> src/emacs.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/emacs.c b/src/emacs.c
> index 866e43fda9..5bd10a7586 100644
> --- a/src/emacs.c
> +++ b/src/emacs.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ along with GNU Emacs. If not, see
> <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
> #include <fcntl.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
>
> +#include <sys/types.h>
> +#include <sys/sysctl.h>
> #include <sys/file.h>
> #include <sys/stat.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> @@ -3156,6 +3158,38 @@ from the parent process and its tty file descriptors.
> */)
> return Qt;
> }
>
> +DEFUN ("processor-count", Fprocessor_count, Sprocessor_count, 0, 0, 0,
> + doc: /* Return the number of CPUs in the system.
> +
> +The value will always be above zero, 1 for unsupported systems. */)
> + (void)
> +{
> + int nproc = -1;
> +#ifdef WINDOWSNT
> + SYSTEM_INFO info;
> + GetSystemInfo(&info);
> + nproc = (int)info.dwNumberOfProcessors;
> +#elif defined (HW_NCPU) || defined (HW_NCPUONLINE)
> + int mib[2];
> + size_t len;
> +
> + mib[0] = CTL_HW;
> +#ifdef HW_NCPUONLINE
> + mib[1] = HW_NCPUONLINE;
> +#else
> + mib[1] = HW_NCPU;
> +#endif
> + len = sizeof(nproc);
> + sysctl(mib, 2, &nproc, &len, NULL, 0);
> +#elif defined (__hpux)
> + nproc = mpctl(MPC_GETNUMSPUS, NULL, NULL);
> +#elif defined (_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN)
> + nproc = (int)sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
> +#endif
> +
> + return make_fixnum (nproc > 1 ? nproc : 1);
> +}
> +
> void
> syms_of_emacs (void)
> {
> @@ -3176,6 +3210,7 @@ syms_of_emacs (void)
> defsubr (&Sinvocation_directory);
> defsubr (&Sdaemonp);
> defsubr (&Sdaemon_initialized);
> + defsubr (&Sprocessor_count);
>
> DEFVAR_LISP ("command-line-args", Vcommand_line_args,
> doc: /* Args passed by shell to Emacs, as a list of strings.
What is wrong on just reading this from /cat/cpuinfo on GNU/Linux?
Windows has "wmic cpu get NumberOfCores,NumberOfLogicalProcessors" which works
on cmd prompt, which means executable from elisp as a process. I dont know for
apple and *bsds.
It is just text that can be parsed directly with elisp, so it is easier to
maintain does not need to be compiled etc. I don't see cpu queries as a
performance crucial query. Just a thought.
- [PATCH] support for accessing CPU/core count (processor-count), Campbell Barton, 2021/10/09
- Re: [PATCH] support for accessing CPU/core count (processor-count), Omar Polo, 2021/10/10
- Re: [PATCH] support for accessing CPU/core count (processor-count),
Arthur Miller <=
- Re: [PATCH] support for accessing CPU/core count (processor-count), Campbell Barton, 2021/10/10
- Re: [PATCH] support for accessing CPU/core count (processor-count), Omar Polo, 2021/10/10
- Re: [PATCH] support for accessing CPU/core count (processor-count), Arthur Miller, 2021/10/10
- Re: [PATCH] support for accessing CPU/core count (processor-count), Omar Polo, 2021/10/10
- Re: [PATCH] support for accessing CPU/core count (processor-count), Arthur Miller, 2021/10/10
- Re: [PATCH] support for accessing CPU/core count (processor-count), Omar Polo, 2021/10/10
- Re: [PATCH] support for accessing CPU/core count (processor-count), Arthur Miller, 2021/10/10
- Re: [PATCH] support for accessing CPU/core count (processor-count), Omar Polo, 2021/10/10
- Re: [PATCH] support for accessing CPU/core count (processor-count), Arthur Miller, 2021/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] support for accessing CPU/core count (processor-count), Arthur Miller, 2021/10/11