[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Indentation of def*
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Indentation of def* |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:38:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:
> Right. And your example is a _function_. Why don't you _at least_ keep
> the heuristic for macros? Isn't that a worthy compromise, a "no-worse"
> situation? It would fix your default-boundp example and, if Richard's
> example deffoober is a macro (I'd say there's a good chance it is,
> statistically speaking) then the calls to that macro would also be
> indented correctly.
>
> What am I missing?
We've been over this. There's both functions and macros that want to be
indented like a defun, and there both functions a macros that don't want
to be, and sometimes they're called something that starts with def* and
sometimes they don't.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
Re: Indentation of def*, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/18
- Re: Indentation of def*, Richard Stallman, 2021/10/20
- Re: Indentation of def*, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/20
- Re: Indentation of def*, João Távora, 2021/10/20
- Re: Indentation of def*,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: Indentation of def*, João Távora, 2021/10/20
- Re: Indentation of def*, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/20
- Re: Indentation of def*, João Távora, 2021/10/20
- Re: Indentation of def*, Richard Stallman, 2021/10/23
- Re: Indentation of def*, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/24
- Re: Indentation of def*, Stefan Kangas, 2021/10/24
- Re: Indentation of def*, João Távora, 2021/10/24
- Re: Indentation of def*, Stefan Monnier, 2021/10/24
- Re: Indentation of def*, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/24
- Re: Indentation of def*, João Távora, 2021/10/24