Re: Moving kbd to subr.el

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

> If we call them `key-bind' and so on, that would be more correct
> semantically (as has been pointed out), and we can use whatever format
> we like for the key to bind (since these names are new anyway).

But the format we want to support is the subset of `kbd' that
`kbd-valid-p' accepts.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no