[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Development Speed
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Development Speed |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Dec 2021 18:42:04 +0200 |
> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 16:21:29 +0100 (CET)
> From: xenodasein@tutanota.de
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> > If you show the code that you tried...
>
> My example was finding out that I couldn't create a minibuffer frame
> from terminal, either to use it as the second background frame in the
> terminal, or possibly to display it in a second terminal or GNU Screen
> side by side.
How did you try doing that? Can you show some simple Lisp that I
could try?
> > No, there should be (ideally) only one set. Applications should be
> > free from dealing with this distinction as much as possible.
>
> IIRC there are other features like (images? svg? videos?)
> that which suggest that terminal and graphical interfaces are already
> diverged and have different capabilities, as they should, by their
> nature. Otherwise, why have functions like "display-graphic-p"?
For the few situations where the ideal is not really achievable. But
that those exist doesn't mean we gave up on the ideal, just that we
are realists.
- Re: Development Speed, (continued)
- Re: Development Speed, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/24
- Re: Development Speed, Richard Stallman, 2021/12/25
- Re: Development Speed, Po Lu, 2021/12/25
- Re: Development Speed, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/25
- Re: Development Speed, Stefan Monnier, 2021/12/25
- Re: Development Speed, Richard Stallman, 2021/12/25
- Re: Development Speed, Sean Whitton, 2021/12/23
- Re: Development Speed, Stefan Monnier, 2021/12/24
- Re: Development Speed, Óscar Fuentes, 2021/12/24
- Re: Development Speed, xenodasein, 2021/12/22
- Re: Development Speed,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Development Speed, xenodasein, 2021/12/23
- Re: Development Speed, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/23