[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Development Speed
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: Development Speed |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Dec 2021 12:16:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> writes:
> Óscar Fuentes <ofv@wanadoo.es> writes:
>
>>> Yes. In fact, some small businesses buy those PCs and install the free
>>> software and firmware onto them.
>
>> Installing GNU/Linux and a Free BIOS does not make a machine 100% Free.
>
> Indeed it doesn't, but the devices Richard referred to are 100% free
> with the free firmware and software installed.
And those are off-the-shelf x86(_64) PCs? Or are machines with special
hardware?
>> Then if the BIOS/UEFI/IME were read-only the FSF would be fine with them
>> being proprietary?
>
> Yes. The ME is undesirable for other reasons, but if the firmware and
> ME were read-only they would not pose freedom issues, as they would be
> indistinguishable from hardware.
Then I'm more of a Free Software purist than the FSF.
I'm interested on what rms says about this.
- Re: Can we give Eli a break, please? [ Was: Re: Development Speed ], (continued)
- Re: Development Speed, Richard Stallman, 2021/12/22
- Re: Development Speed, Óscar Fuentes, 2021/12/23
- Re: Development Speed, Po Lu, 2021/12/23
- Re: Development Speed, Óscar Fuentes, 2021/12/23
- Re: Development Speed, Po Lu, 2021/12/23
- Re: Development Speed, Óscar Fuentes, 2021/12/23
- Re: Development Speed, Po Lu, 2021/12/23
- Re: Development Speed,
Óscar Fuentes <=
- Re: Development Speed, Richard Stallman, 2021/12/23
- Re: Development Speed, Richard Stallman, 2021/12/23
- Re: Development Speed, Arthur Miller, 2021/12/23
- Re: Development Speed, Richard Stallman, 2021/12/23
- Re: Development Speed, xenodasein, 2021/12/22
Re: Development Speed, xenodasein, 2021/12/21