[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Naming FCRs
|
From: |
Dmitry Gutov |
|
Subject: |
Re: Naming FCRs |
|
Date: |
Mon, 27 Dec 2021 00:29:29 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 |
On 27.12.2021 01:04, Stefan Monnier wrote:
- Monomaniac objects (since they're a bit like OO-style objects but
limited to have only exactly one method).
A function with a value attached sounds like a "method".
Not too fun, though.
I also looked at the branch briefly -- if it's what it sounded like then
you might be setting up a new "Callable protocol" which can allow any
object to serve as a function, not just records? Like how maps are
callable in Clojure.