[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Not using DOC for ELisp files
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Not using DOC for ELisp files |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Dec 2021 14:44:23 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 20:48:22 -0500
>
> The patch below removes from the DOC file the docstrings coming from
> ELisp files.
What does this mean in terms of the run-time requirements in order to
get the doc strings for preloaded files? Does it mean their *.elc
files should be available from the installation tree? Or does it mean
the *.el files (which might be compressed) must be available? And
what does this mean for a natively-compiled installation?
If there are any non-trivial consequences of this change, i.e. distros
will now need to make sure something happens that they didn't before,
I think we should get their opinions before we install this.
Thanks.
- Re: Not using DOC for ELisp files, (continued)
- Re: Not using DOC for ELisp files, LdBeth, 2021/12/27
- Re: Not using DOC for ELisp files, Stefan Monnier, 2021/12/28
- Re: Not using DOC for ELisp files, Po Lu, 2021/12/28
- Re: Not using DOC for ELisp files, Phil Sainty, 2021/12/28
- Re: Not using DOC for ELisp files, Po Lu, 2021/12/28
- Re: Not using DOC for ELisp files, Po Lu, 2021/12/28
Re: Not using DOC for ELisp files, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/28
Re: Not using DOC for ELisp files, Stefan Kangas, 2021/12/27
Re: Not using DOC for ELisp files, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/28
Re: Not using DOC for ELisp files,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Not using DOC for ELisp files, Stefan Monnier, 2021/12/28
- Re: Not using DOC for ELisp files, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/29
- Re: Not using DOC for ELisp files, Stefan Monnier, 2021/12/29
- Re: Not using DOC for ELisp files, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/30
- Re: Not using DOC for ELisp files, Stefan Monnier, 2021/12/30
- Re: Not using DOC for ELisp files, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/31