[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Naming FCRs
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Naming FCRs |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Dec 2021 11:19:29 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
I think we should extend the functionality of closures by providing a
way to access the bound variables in them. Then we won't need to make
Emacs Lisp more complicated with a new data type, because ordinary
closures will do this job too.
Does anyone argue that it is important to distinguish between closures
that permit access and closures that don't permit access?
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: Naming FCRs, (continued)
Re: Naming FCRs, Richard Stallman, 2021/12/26
Re: Naming FCRs, Jim Porter, 2021/12/26
- Message not available
- Re: Naming FCRs, Jim Porter, 2021/12/28
- Re: Naming FCRs, Phil Sainty, 2021/12/28
- Re: Naming FCRs,
Richard Stallman <=
- RE: [External] : Re: Naming FCRs, Drew Adams, 2021/12/29
- Re: Naming FCRs, Stefan Monnier, 2021/12/29
- Re: Naming FCRs, LdBeth, 2021/12/29
- Re: Naming FCRs, Richard Stallman, 2021/12/29
- Re: Naming FCRs, tomas, 2021/12/30
- Re: Naming FCRs, Tomas Hlavaty, 2021/12/30
- Re: Naming FCRs, Stefan Monnier, 2021/12/30
- Re: Naming FCRs, Tomas Hlavaty, 2021/12/30
- Re: Naming FCRs, Richard Stallman, 2021/12/30