[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sqlite3
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: sqlite3 |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Dec 2021 19:51:32 +0200 |
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 16:11:09 +0100
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > That'd be fine by me, I think updating the same value simultaneously
> > from several Emacsen is a pretty corner use case anyway.
>
> Now done.
The "simple" test still fails sometimes. I even enlarged the
sleep-for to 10 sec, and it still fails.
> > We can delay the solution until someone really needs that, and
> > explains why. We do need to say something about the races in the
> > docs, I think.
>
> Do we need to say more than it does? Which is:
>
> --
> But note that this is done without locking, so if many
> instances are updating the value at the same time, it's unpredictable
> which instance ``wins''.
Sounds good enough, thanks.
- Re: sqlite3, (continued)
- Re: sqlite3, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/27
- Re: sqlite3, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/27
- Re: sqlite3, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/27
- Re: sqlite3, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/27
- Re: sqlite3, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/28
- Re: sqlite3, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/28
- Re: sqlite3, Po Lu, 2021/12/28
- Re: sqlite3, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/28
- Re: sqlite3, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/28
- Re: sqlite3, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/29
- Re: sqlite3,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: sqlite3, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/29
- Re: sqlite3, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/29
- Re: sqlite3, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/30
- Re: sqlite3, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/30
- Re: sqlite3, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/30
- Re: sqlite3, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/30
- Re: sqlite3, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/18
- Re: sqlite3, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/19
- Re: sqlite3, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/19
- Re: sqlite3, Juri Linkov, 2021/12/16