Re: cl-block less lexical than expected

[Robin Tarsiger]

Robin Tarsiger wrote:
> cl-return-from could then try to evaluate the variable
> to get the tag; the warnings/errors for bad tags would be awkward
> to read, but at least the semantics would be correct.

Slight correction---they would be correct _provided that_ lexical-binding
were in use for the let. However, I gather having it on almost all the time
is becoming the norm (and maybe the macros could warn if it's off).

-RTT