[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PGTK-related misconceptions
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: PGTK-related misconceptions |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Apr 2022 13:31:39 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri 15 Apr 2022 at 10:29am +08, Po Lu wrote:
>
>> People using X should _never_ use PGTK. The regular X build does a much
>> better job at supporting that than PGTK ever will.
>
> The discussion of pgtk in INSTALL doesn't say this. If I was packaging
> Emacs for a distro I think I could be misled into thinking I should
> replace my gtk package with pgtk. But in fact I should supply both.
INSTALL already recommends PGTK only for using alternative window
systems, not X, which is explained first.
Thanks.
- PGTK-related misconceptions, Po Lu, 2022/04/14
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Byung-Hee HWANG, 2022/04/15
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Eric Abrahamsen, 2022/04/15
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Sean Whitton, 2022/04/18
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions,
Po Lu <=
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Sean Whitton, 2022/04/18
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Po Lu, 2022/04/18
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Sean Whitton, 2022/04/18
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Jim Porter, 2022/04/18
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Po Lu, 2022/04/18
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Sean Whitton, 2022/04/18
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Tim Cross, 2022/04/18
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/04/19
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Tim Cross, 2022/04/19
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/04/19