[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PGTK-related misconceptions
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: PGTK-related misconceptions |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jul 2022 10:50:00 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
Akira Kyle <akira@akirakyle.com> writes:
> I'm not totally convinced, since sway should just be using the .xkb
> file I specify. The relevant code is in sway/input/keyboard.c where it
> uses the .xkb file in sway_keyboard_compile_keymap which then sway
> sets using wlr_keyboard_set_keymap inside
> sway_keyboard_configure. So this should be the same keymap that GTK is
> using.
It would be nice if you (or someone else) set a breakpoint here:
->if (mods & (1 << xkb_keymap_mod_get_index (xkb_keymap, "Super")))
state |= GDK_SUPER_MASK;
in the GDK source code to see what real modifier gets returned under
Sway.
TIA.
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, (continued)
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Po Lu, 2022/07/25
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/07/26
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Akira Kyle, 2022/07/26
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Po Lu, 2022/07/26
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Trey Peacock, 2022/07/27
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Po Lu, 2022/07/27
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Trey Peacock, 2022/07/27
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Po Lu, 2022/07/27
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Akira Kyle, 2022/07/27
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions,
Po Lu <=