[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s
From: |
Theodor Thornhill |
Subject: |
Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Dec 2022 13:50:55 +0100 |
Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> You can try. I would like to start a full feature freeze in a day or
>> two, so I'm not sure you will have enough time. And it isn't like we
>> didn't try various approaches during the past two months, so frankly I
>> don't think that a better way even exists. But if you come up with
>> some very bright idea, who knows?
>
> I have attached a sketch of my proposal with support for Python.
> Instead of a separate python-ts-mode, we regulate tree-sitter support
> using a user option `treesit-enabled-modes'. It can either be a list
>
[...]
IIUC this will make all other config run before the treesit-related
code? In that case I think this cannot work, because we _don't_ want to
set all the before/after-change functions many modes set, for example.
Theo
- Need for "-ts-mode" modes, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/29
- Re: Need for "-ts-mode" modes, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/29
- Re: Need for "-ts-mode" modes, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/29
- Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s,
Theodor Thornhill <=
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Theodor Thornhill, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Theodor Thornhill, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/30