[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: jinx
|
From: |
João Pedro |
|
Subject: |
Re: jinx |
|
Date: |
Wed, 29 Mar 2023 22:02:37 -0300 |
Hey Michael,
On Wed, March 29 2023 22:46, Michael Eliachevitch <m.eliachevitch@posteo.de>
wrote:
> But it currently lacks the ability to check the entire buffer
Little correction here. It does have a "check the entire buffer"
functionality, just call jinx-correct with a universal-argument (C-u).
Best regards,
--
João Pedro de A. Paula
- jinx, Richard Stallman, 2023/03/28
- Re: jinx, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/03/29
- Re: jinx, Michael Eliachevitch, 2023/03/29
- Re: jinx,
João Pedro <=
- Re: jinx, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/30
- Re: jinx, Richard Stallman, 2023/03/31
- Re: jinx, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/31
- Re: jinx, Gregory Heytings, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking (was: jinx), Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Gregory Heytings, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Gregory Heytings, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Lynn Winebarger, 2023/03/31