emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: emacs-29 9b775ddc057 1/2: ; * etc/EGLOT-NEWS: Fix wording of last ch


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: emacs-29 9b775ddc057 1/2: ; * etc/EGLOT-NEWS: Fix wording of last change.
Date: Sat, 06 May 2023 22:08:11 +0300

> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
> Cc: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev>,  Stefan Monnier
>  <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 06 May 2023 18:44:35 +0000
> 
> > If package-upgrade was not in Emacs 28, how did users upgrade
> > installed packages in Emacs 28 and before?
> 
> They invoked M-x list-packages, waited for the upgrade to appear,
> selected them with U and then executed the update with x.  This is what
> used to work, and what will continue to work.

But only if package-install-upgrade-built-in is non-nil, right?

> > I don't see a zero-sum game here.  We could focus on both.  But I
> > don't use package.el and never will, so if those who use it and
> > maintain it think otherwise, I won't insist.  Although I find this
> > stance very strange indeed, to say the least.
> 
> (This explains some of the confusion, I was under the assumption that
> some of your questions were from a position of Socratic ignorance,

You should know me better.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]