Re: master updated (cd8d3f3379e -> 1b0348d9593)

[Stefan Monnier]

> It looks like this patch series has broken esh-util-tests.el. Try
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> # make -C test esh-util-tests
> ...
> Test esh-util-test/eshell-stringify/list condition:
>     (ert-test-failed
>      ((should (equal (eshell-stringify ...) "((1 2)\n (3 . 4))")) :form
>       (equal "((1 2) (3 . 4))" "((1 2)\n (3 . 4))") :value nil
>       :explanation
>       (arrays-of-different-length 15 16 "((1 2) (3 . 4))"
>                                 "((1 2)\n (3 . 4))" first-mismatch-at 6)))
>    FAILED   9/13  esh-util-test/eshell-stringify/list (0.000212 sec) at 
> lisp/eshell/esh-util-tests.el:47
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

I don't think it's a bug if the output of the pretty printer is

    ((1 2) (3 . 4))

rather than

    ((1 2)
     (3 . 4))

so I think the esh-util-tests is just too strict: both output are valid,
as are various others such as

    ((1
      2)
     (3
      . 4))

Not knowing what the test is indeed the check I'm not sure how it should
be fixed.  Maybe replace all `[ \n]+` with SPC ?


        Stefan