Re: Ok to backport Eshell manual improvements to 29?

[Jim Porter]

On 7/14/2023 12:10 AM, Juri Linkov wrote:
> Is there a policy that requires deleting a merged branch?
> (I'm asking because it was very convenient to type just "-29"
> to complete to the "emacs-29" branch, but now the name
> "backport-eshell-docs-to-29" gets in the way ;-)

I deleted my scratch branch right after merging it[1]. Maybe you just 
need to call something like `git remote prune origin` to clean up your 
local references to the branch?

[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-diffs/2023-07/msg00305.html