Re: [GNU ELPA] New package: tam

[Adam Porter]

On 9/21/23 15:26, Richard Stallman wrote:

>    > Thanks for taking a look.  The reason is that I was thinking about
>    > adding functionality for pools of preallocated objects that leverage
>    > the tables for tracking which objects are actually being used.
>
> I don't have much of a picture of what you're using this for.
> For all I know, maybe it is a good method for that use.
>
> But it does seem un-lispy.

Agreed.  I am interested in it, but I'd like to know more about what 
problem it's intended to solve.  e.g. I've had functions that certainly 
do allocation and GC in a process sentinel, and AFAIK that hasn't been a 
problem.  But a project I'm working on may exercise this kind of 
functionality more in the future, so maybe tam.el could be helpful.