> From: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh@janestreet.com>
> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 10:21:47 -0500
> Cc: juri@linkov.net, sbaugh@catern.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> I feel confident that more users will understand "History order" than "in the
> order of their typing".
>
> How about "Sorted in the order of minibuffer history"?
That's better, but if you are okay with that, how about "Sorted in the
chronological order of minibuffer input"?
That does not mention history, so I think it's worse - how are user supposed to know it's about history? But I'm okay with "Sorted in chronological order of minibuffer history".